You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Assessment of the 5-Minute Oxygen Uptake Efficiency Slope in Children With Obesity.
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Pediatric Exercise Science, March 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1123/pes.2016-0248 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Katrin A Dias, Concetta E Masterson, Matthew P Wallen, Arnt E Tjonna, Mansoureh S Hosseini, Peter S W Davies, Peter A Cain, Gary M Leong, Ross Arena, Charlotte B Ingul, Jeff S Coombes |
| Abstract |
Poor cardiorespiratory fitness is associated with increased all cause morbidity and mortality. In children with obesity, maximum oxygen uptake (V̇O2max) may not be achieved due to reduced motivation and peripheral fatigue. We aimed to identify a valid submaximal surrogate for V̇O2max in children with obesity. Ninety-two children with obesity (7-16 years) completed a maximal exercise treadmill test and entered a three-month exercise and/or nutrition intervention after which the exercise test was repeated (n=63). Participants were required to reach V̇O2max to be included in this analysis (n=32 at baseline and n=13 at both time-points). The oxygen uptake efficiency slope (OUES) was determined as the slope of the line when V̇O2 (L/min) was plotted against logV̇E. Associations between the maximal OUES, submaximal OUES (at 3, 4, 5 and 6 minutes of the exercise test) and V̇O2max were calculated. In the cross-sectional analysis, V̇O2max (L/min) was strongly correlated with 5-min OUES independent of Tanner puberty stage and sex (R(2)=0.80, P<0.001). Longitudinal changes in V̇O2max were closely reflected by changes in 5-min OUES independent of change in percent body fat (R2=0.63, P<0.05). The 5-min OUES is a viable alternative to V̇O2max when assessing children with obesity. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 74 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 13 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 11 | 15% |
| Unknown | 23 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 13 | 18% |
| Sports and Recreations | 11 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 9% |
| Psychology | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 24 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2017.
All research outputs
#17,289,387
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Exercise Science
#320
of 466 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#209,785
of 323,974 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Exercise Science
#7
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 466 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,974 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.