↓ Skip to main content

Leaf litter quality drives litter mixing effects through complementary resource use among detritivores

Overview of attention for article published in Oecologia, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
81 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
137 Mendeley
Title
Leaf litter quality drives litter mixing effects through complementary resource use among detritivores
Published in
Oecologia, January 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00442-012-2588-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Veronique C. A. Vos, Jasper van Ruijven, Matty P. Berg, Edwin T. H. M. Peeters, Frank Berendse

Abstract

To comprehend the potential consequences of biodiversity loss on the leaf litter decomposition process, a better understanding of its underlying mechanisms is necessary. Here, we hypothesize that positive litter mixture effects occur via complementary resource use, when litter species complement each other in terms of resource quality for detritivores. To investigate this, monocultures and mixtures of two leaf litter species varying in quality were allowed to decompose with and without a single macro-detritivore species (the terrestrial woodlice Oniscus asellus). Resource quality of the mixture was assessed by the mean concentration, the dissimilarity in absolute and relative concentrations, and the covariance between nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P) and calcium (Ca) supply. Our results clearly show that litter mixing effects were driven by differences in their resource quality for detritivores. In particular, complementary supply of N and P was a major driver of litter mixing effects. Interestingly, litter mixing effects caused by the addition of woodlice were predominantly driven by N dissimilarity, whereas in their absence, increased P concentration was the main driver of litter mixing effects. These results show that ultimately, litter diversity effects on decomposition may be driven by complementary resource use of the whole decomposer community (i.e., microbes and macro-detritivores).

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Argentina 3 2%
United States 2 1%
Austria 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 128 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 20%
Student > Master 25 18%
Researcher 18 13%
Student > Bachelor 13 9%
Professor 11 8%
Other 19 14%
Unknown 24 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 69 50%
Environmental Science 27 20%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 1%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 <1%
Other 2 1%
Unknown 31 23%