↓ Skip to main content

Health protection in times of economic crisis: Challenges and opportunities for Europe

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Public Health Policy, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
107 Mendeley
Title
Health protection in times of economic crisis: Challenges and opportunities for Europe
Published in
Journal of Public Health Policy, August 2013
DOI 10.1057/jphp.2013.35
Pubmed ID
Authors

David McDaid, Gianluca Quaglio, António Correia de Campos, Claudio Dario, Lieve Van Woensel, Theodoros Karapiperis, Aaron Reeves

Abstract

STOA, the European Parliament's technology assessment body, and the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies recently organised a workshop on the impacts of the economic crisis on European health systems. Evidence of the impact of the recent financial crisis on health outcomes is only just beginning to emerge. Data suggests that this latest recession has led to more frequent poor health status, rising incidence of some communicable diseases, and higher suicide rates. Further, available data are likely to underestimate the broader mental health crisis linked to increased rates of stress, anxiety, and depression among the economically vulnerable. Not only does recession affect factors that determine health, but it also affects the financial capacity to respond. Many European governments have reduced public expenditure on health services during the financial crisis, while introducing or increasing user charges. The recession has driven structural reforms, and has affected the priority given to public policies that could be used to help protect population health. The current economic climate, while challenging, presents an opportunity for reforming and restructuring health promotion actions and taking a long-term perspective.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 2%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 101 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 17%
Student > Master 18 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 10%
Student > Bachelor 11 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 8%
Other 19 18%
Unknown 21 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 10%
Psychology 11 10%
Social Sciences 10 9%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 10 9%
Other 10 9%
Unknown 24 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2015.
All research outputs
#7,126,329
of 24,755,976 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Public Health Policy
#342
of 839 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,892
of 205,943 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Public Health Policy
#4
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,755,976 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 839 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,943 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.