You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Toll and Imd Pathways Are Not Required for Wolbachia-Mediated Dengue Virus Interference
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Virology, August 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1128/jvi.01522-13 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Edwige Rancès, Travis K. Johnson, Jean Popovici, Iñaki Iturbe-Ormaetxe, Tasnim Zakir, Coral G. Warr, Scott L. O'Neill |
| Abstract |
Wolbachia blocks dengue virus replication in Drosophila melanogaster as well as in Aedes aegypti. Using the Drosophila model and mutations in the Toll and Imd pathways, we showed that neither pathway is required for expression of the dengue virus-blocking phenotype in the Drosophila host. This provides additional evidence that the mechanistic basis of Wolbachia-mediated dengue virus blocking in insects is more complex than simple priming of the host insect innate immune system. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 50% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 126 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 26% |
| Researcher | 28 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 16 | 12% |
| Unknown | 16 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 60 | 45% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 27 | 20% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 8 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 10% |
| Unknown | 15 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2014.
All research outputs
#6,753,656
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Virology
#9,503
of 25,691 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,541
of 212,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Virology
#73
of 200 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,691 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,168 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 200 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.