↓ Skip to main content

Body Mass Index, Depression, and Condom Use Among HIV-Infected Men who have Sex with Men: A Longitudinal Moderation Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Sexual Behavior, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
Title
Body Mass Index, Depression, and Condom Use Among HIV-Infected Men who have Sex with Men: A Longitudinal Moderation Analysis
Published in
Archives of Sexual Behavior, August 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10508-013-0155-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aaron J. Blashill, Kenneth H. Mayer, Heidi M. Crane, Joshua S. Baker, James H. Willig, Amanda L. Willig, Chris Grasso, Conall O’Cleirigh, Steven A. Safren

Abstract

Findings have been inconsistent regarding the association of obesity and sexual risk behaviors. The purpose of the current study was to assess the prospective nature of body mass index (BMI), depression, and their interaction in predicting condom use during anal intercourse among HIV-infected men who have sex with men (MSM). The sample (N = 490) was obtained from a large, HIV clinical cohort from four sites across the U.S. The following inclusion criteria were employed: identification as MSM and had completed at least one wave of patient-reported measures (e.g., depression, as measured by the PHQ-9) in the clinical cohort study. Longitudinal linear mixed-effects modeling revealed a significant BMI by depression interaction. Depressive symptoms were predictive of less frequent condom use for obese but not overweight men. Analogous results were found in regard to comparisons between normal weight and overweight men. Obesity, in the context of depression, is a risk factor for unprotected anal intercourse among HIV-infected MSM. Cognitive behavioral interventions to reduce HIV transmission risk behaviors among HIV-infected MSM should adopt an integrated perspective, combining sexual risk reduction with treatment for depression and body-related concerns.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Belgium 1 1%
Unknown 82 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 17%
Student > Bachelor 12 14%
Researcher 11 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Other 13 16%
Unknown 18 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 18 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 12%
Social Sciences 9 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 23 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2014.
All research outputs
#15,026,718
of 23,312,088 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#2,891
of 3,476 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,696
of 200,783 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#36
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,312,088 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,476 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.1. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,783 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.