↓ Skip to main content

Cross-covariances and localization for EnKF in multiphase flow data assimilation

Overview of attention for article published in Computational Geosciences, December 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#41 of 138)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
142 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
Title
Cross-covariances and localization for EnKF in multiphase flow data assimilation
Published in
Computational Geosciences, December 2009
DOI 10.1007/s10596-009-9174-6
Authors

Yan Chen, Dean S. Oliver

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Russia 1 2%
Unknown 45 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 30%
Researcher 13 28%
Student > Master 4 9%
Other 2 4%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 4%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 8 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 13 28%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 11 23%
Mathematics 4 9%
Energy 3 6%
Computer Science 2 4%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 11 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2016.
All research outputs
#7,522,616
of 22,958,253 outputs
Outputs from Computational Geosciences
#41
of 138 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,739
of 165,755 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Computational Geosciences
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,958,253 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 138 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,755 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.