↓ Skip to main content

The dynamics of multimodal integration: The averaging diffusion model

Overview of attention for article published in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
Title
The dynamics of multimodal integration: The averaging diffusion model
Published in
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, March 2017
DOI 10.3758/s13423-017-1255-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brandon M. Turner, Juan Gao, Scott Koenig, Dylan Palfy, James L. McClelland

Abstract

We combine extant theories of evidence accumulation and multi-modal integration to develop an integrated framework for modeling multimodal integration as a process that unfolds in real time. Many studies have formulated sensory processing as a dynamic process where noisy samples of evidence are accumulated until a decision is made. However, these studies are often limited to a single sensory modality. Studies of multimodal stimulus integration have focused on how best to combine different sources of information to elicit a judgment. These studies are often limited to a single time point, typically after the integration process has occurred. We address these limitations by combining the two approaches. Experimentally, we present data that allow us to study the time course of evidence accumulation within each of the visual and auditory domains as well as in a bimodal condition. Theoretically, we develop a new Averaging Diffusion Model in which the decision variable is the mean rather than the sum of evidence samples and use it as a base for comparing three alternative models of multimodal integration, allowing us to assess the optimality of this integration. The outcome reveals rich individual differences in multimodal integration: while some subjects' data are consistent with adaptive optimal integration, reweighting sources of evidence as their relative reliability changes during evidence integration, others exhibit patterns inconsistent with optimality.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 75 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 28%
Student > Master 16 21%
Student > Bachelor 10 13%
Researcher 7 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 9 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 28 37%
Neuroscience 16 21%
Engineering 3 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Other 11 15%
Unknown 13 17%