↓ Skip to main content

Quantifying Population Genetic Differentiation from Next-Generation Sequencing Data

Overview of attention for article published in Genetics, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
11 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
187 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
449 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Quantifying Population Genetic Differentiation from Next-Generation Sequencing Data
Published in
Genetics, November 2013
DOI 10.1534/genetics.113.154740
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matteo Fumagalli, Filipe G. Vieira, Thorfinn Sand Korneliussen, Tyler Linderoth, Emilia Huerta-Sánchez, Anders Albrechtsen, Rasmus Nielsen

Abstract

Over the past few years, new high-throughput DNA sequencing technologies have dramatically increased speed and reduced sequencing costs. However, the use of these sequencing technologies is often challenged by errors and biases associated with the bioinformatical methods used for analyzing the data. In particular, the use of naïve methods to identify polymorphic sites and infer genotypes can inflate downstream analyses. Recently, explicit modeling of genotype probability distributions has been proposed as a method for taking genotype call uncertainty into account. Based on this idea, we propose a novel method for quantifying population genetic differentiation from next-generation sequencing data. In addition, we present a strategy for investigating population structure via principal components analysis. Through extensive simulations, we compare the new method herein proposed to approaches based on genotype calling and demonstrate a marked improvement in estimation accuracy for a wide range of conditions. We apply the method to a large-scale genomic data set of domesticated and wild silkworms sequenced at low coverage. We find that we can infer the fine-scale genetic structure of the sampled individuals, suggesting that employing this new method is useful for investigating the genetic relationships of populations sampled at low coverage.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 449 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 12 3%
Switzerland 3 <1%
Sweden 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 422 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 118 26%
Researcher 111 25%
Student > Master 61 14%
Student > Bachelor 33 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 4%
Other 56 12%
Unknown 50 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 272 61%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 65 14%
Environmental Science 27 6%
Arts and Humanities 6 1%
Computer Science 5 1%
Other 17 4%
Unknown 57 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2022.
All research outputs
#3,081,594
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Genetics
#1,113
of 7,589 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,597
of 230,702 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genetics
#17
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,589 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 230,702 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.