↓ Skip to main content

The Need for International Terminology and Definitions for Texture-Modified Foods and Thickened Liquids Used in Dysphagia Management: Foundations of a Global Initiative

Overview of attention for article published in Current Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Reports, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#4 of 172)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
32 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
280 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
372 Mendeley
Title
The Need for International Terminology and Definitions for Texture-Modified Foods and Thickened Liquids Used in Dysphagia Management: Foundations of a Global Initiative
Published in
Current Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Reports, August 2013
DOI 10.1007/s40141-013-0024-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julie A. Y. Cichero, Catriona Steele, Janice Duivestein, Pere Clavé, Jianshe Chen, Jun Kayashita, Roberto Dantas, Caroline Lecko, Renee Speyer, Peter Lam, Joseph Murray

Abstract

Conservative estimates suggest that dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) affects approximately 8 % of the world's population. Dysphagia is associated with malnutrition, dehydration, chest infection and potentially death. While promising treatments are being developed to improve function, the modification of food texture and liquid thickness has become a cornerstone of dysphagia management. Foods are chopped, mashed or puréed to compensate for chewing difficulties or fatigue, improve swallowing safety and avoid asphyxiation. Liquids are typically thickened to slow their speed of transit through the oral and pharyngeal phases of swallowing, to avoid aspiration of material into the airway and improve transit to the esophagus. Food texture and liquid modification for dysphagia management occurs throughout the world. However, the names, the number of levels of modification and characteristics vary within and across countries. Multiple labels increase the risk to patient safety. National standardization of terminology and definitions has been promoted as a means to improve patient safety and inter-professional communication. This article documents the need for international standardized terminology and definitions for texture-modified foods and liquids for individuals with dysphagia. Furthermore, it documents the research plan and foundations of a global initiative dedicated to this purpose.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 372 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 370 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 61 16%
Student > Bachelor 59 16%
Researcher 35 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 8%
Other 27 7%
Other 51 14%
Unknown 111 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 71 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 63 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 37 10%
Engineering 13 3%
Linguistics 10 3%
Other 52 14%
Unknown 126 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 48. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2018.
All research outputs
#863,042
of 25,211,948 outputs
Outputs from Current Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Reports
#4
of 172 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,151
of 206,676 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Reports
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,211,948 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 172 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,676 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.