↓ Skip to main content

Opening pressures and atelectrauma in acute respiratory distress syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
38 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
103 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
232 Mendeley
Title
Opening pressures and atelectrauma in acute respiratory distress syndrome
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine, March 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00134-017-4754-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Massimo Cressoni, Davide Chiumello, Ilaria Algieri, Matteo Brioni, Chiara Chiurazzi, Andrea Colombo, Angelo Colombo, Francesco Crimella, Mariateresa Guanziroli, Ivan Tomic, Tommaso Tonetti, Giordano Luca Vergani, Eleonora Carlesso, Vladimir Gasparovic, Luciano Gattinoni

Abstract

Open lung strategy during ARDS aims to decrease the ventilator-induced lung injury by minimizing the atelectrauma and stress/strain maldistribution. We aim to assess how much of the lung is opened and kept open within the limits of mechanical ventilation considered safe (i.e., plateau pressure 30 cmH2O, PEEP 15 cmH2O). Prospective study from two university hospitals. Thirty-three ARDS patients (5 mild, 10 moderate, 9 severe without extracorporeal support, ECMO, and 9 severe with it) underwent two low-dose end-expiratory CT scans at PEEP 5 and 15 cmH2O and four end-inspiratory CT scans (from 19 to 40 cmH2O). Recruitment was defined as the fraction of lung tissue which regained inflation. The atelectrauma was estimated as the difference between the intratidal tissue collapse at 5 and 15 cmH2O PEEP. Lung ventilation inhomogeneities were estimated as the ratio of inflation between neighboring lung units. The lung tissue which is opened between 30 and 45 cmH2O (i.e., always closed at plateau 30 cmH2O) was 10 ± 29, 54 ± 86, 162 ± 92, and 185 ± 134 g in mild, moderate, and severe ARDS without and with ECMO, respectively (p < 0.05 mild versus severe without or with ECMO). The intratidal collapses were similar at PEEP 5 and 15 cmH2O (63 ± 26 vs 39 ± 32 g in mild ARDS, p = 0.23; 92 ± 53 vs 78 ± 142 g in moderate ARDS, p = 0.76; 110 ± 91 vs 89 ± 93, p = 0.57 in severe ARDS without ECMO; 135 ± 100 vs 104 ± 80, p = 0.32 in severe ARDS with ECMO). Increasing the applied airway pressure up to 45 cmH2O decreased the lung inhomogeneity slightly (but significantly) in mild and moderate ARDS, but not in severe ARDS. Data show that the prerequisites of the open lung strategy are not satisfied using PEEP up to 15 cmH2O and plateau pressure up to 30 cmH2O. For an effective open lung strategy, higher pressures are required. Therefore, risks of atelectrauma must be weighted versus risks of volutrauma. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT01670747 ( www.clinicaltrials.gov ).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 232 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 228 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 29 13%
Other 28 12%
Student > Postgraduate 20 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 17 7%
Student > Master 17 7%
Other 54 23%
Unknown 67 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 131 56%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 4%
Engineering 4 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 1%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 <1%
Other 10 4%
Unknown 72 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2021.
All research outputs
#1,561,094
of 25,382,250 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#1,343
of 5,397 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,499
of 310,645 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#34
of 123 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,250 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,397 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,645 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 123 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.