↓ Skip to main content

The current spectrum of infection in cancer patients with chemotherapy related neutropenia

Overview of attention for article published in Infection, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
148 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
220 Mendeley
Title
The current spectrum of infection in cancer patients with chemotherapy related neutropenia
Published in
Infection, August 2013
DOI 10.1007/s15010-013-0525-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lior Nesher, Kenneth V. I. Rolston

Abstract

Despite advancements in the treatment and supportive care of patients with malignant disorders, neutropenia remains the major side effect of most antineoplastic regimens. Infections occur frequently in neutropenic patients and are associated with considerable morbidity and mortality. The spectrum of infection continues to change, and is influenced by various factors including local epidemiology, the use of chemoprophylaxis, and the use of central venous catheters and other medical devices. Bacterial infections are common in the early stages of neutropenia, with fungal infections emerging if neutropenia persists beyond 7-10 days. Gram-positive organisms cause most bacteremic infections (although this trend appears to be changing), whereas infections at other sites are often caused by Gram-negative bacilli or are polymicrobial, especially if deep tissue infection is present. Candida spp., and Aspergillus spp., remain the most common fungal pathogens, although several opportunistic fungi have emerged. Resistance to antimicrobial and antifungal agents commonly used for the prevention and treatment of infections in neutropenic patients has become a significant problem. The prompt administration of appropriate, empiric, antimicrobial therapy, prior to the availability of microbiological culture results, is the standard of care. Up to date knowledge of the spectrum of infection and local susceptibility/resistance patterns, is critical. In this report, we describe the current spectrum of infection in patients with malignancies and neutropenia, and emphasize the fact that local and geographic differences are not infrequent. We recommend that individual institutions conduct periodic epidemiological surveys in order to have the latest data available for the optimal management of their patients.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 220 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 220 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 27 12%
Researcher 23 10%
Student > Postgraduate 23 10%
Other 21 10%
Student > Master 20 9%
Other 41 19%
Unknown 65 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 97 44%
Immunology and Microbiology 12 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 4%
Other 15 7%
Unknown 67 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2013.
All research outputs
#4,156,863
of 22,719,618 outputs
Outputs from Infection
#208
of 1,398 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,603
of 199,041 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Infection
#3
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,719,618 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,398 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,041 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.