↓ Skip to main content

Assessment of student competency in a simulated speech-language pathology clinical placement

Overview of attention for article published in Advances in Speech Language Pathology, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Assessment of student competency in a simulated speech-language pathology clinical placement
Published in
Advances in Speech Language Pathology, August 2013
DOI 10.3109/17549507.2013.809603
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anne E. Hill, Bronwyn J. Davidson, Sue McAllister, Judith Wright, Deborah G. Theodoros

Abstract

Clinical education programs in speech-language pathology enable the transition of students' knowledge and skills from the classroom to the workplace. Simulated clinical learning experiences provide an opportunity to address the competency development of novice students. This study reports on the validation of an assessment tool designed to evaluate speech-language pathology students' performance in a simulated clinical placement. The Assessment of Foundation Clinical Skills (AFCS) was designed to link to concepts and content of COMPASS(®): Competency Assessment in Speech Pathology, a validated assessment of performance in the workplace. It incorporates units and elements of competency relevant to the placement. The validity of the AFCS was statistically investigated using Rasch analysis. Participants were 18 clinical educators and 130 speech-language pathology students undertaking the placement. Preliminary results support the validity of the AFCS as an assessment of foundation clinical skills of students in this simulated clinical placement. All units of competency and the majority of elements were relevant and representative of these skills. The use of a visual analogue scale which included a pre-Novice level to rate students' performance on units of competency was supported. This research provides guidance for development of quality assessments of performance in simulated placements.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 64 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 19%
Lecturer 7 10%
Researcher 6 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Other 15 22%
Unknown 16 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 16 24%
Social Sciences 13 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 13%
Psychology 5 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 20 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2014.
All research outputs
#4,824,580
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Advances in Speech Language Pathology
#246
of 832 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,728
of 211,843 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in Speech Language Pathology
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 832 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,843 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.