↓ Skip to main content

We strongly support childhood immunisation-statement from the European Academy of Paediatrics (EAP)

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Pediatrics, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
Title
We strongly support childhood immunisation-statement from the European Academy of Paediatrics (EAP)
Published in
European Journal of Pediatrics, March 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00431-017-2885-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hans Juergen Dornbusch, Adamos Hadjipanayis, Stefano del Torso, Jean-Christophe Mercier, Corinne Wyder, Lenneke Schrier, Robert Ross-Russell, Tom Stiris, Jonas F. Ludvigsson

Abstract

The eradication of smallpox and the elimination of several other infectious diseases from much of the world has provided convincing evidence that vaccines are among the most effective interventions for promoting health. The current scepticism about immunisation among members of the new US administration carries a risk of decreasing immunisation rates also in Europe. While only a small minority of the population are strongly anti-vaccine, their public activities have significantly influenced an uncertainty among the general population about both the safety of and the necessity for vaccination. Therefore, the EAP calls for greater publically available, scientifically supported information on vaccination, particularly targeted at health care providers, for the further development of electronically based immunisation information systems (IIS). We further call on all European countries to work together both in legislative and public health arenas in order to increase vaccination coverage among the paediatric population. In the interest of children and their parents, the EAP expresses its strong support for childhood immunisation and recommended vaccination schedules. We are prepared to work with governments and media and share the extensive evidence demonstrating the effectiveness and safety of vaccines.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 4 13%
Researcher 3 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 9%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 3%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 15 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 4 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 6%
Psychology 2 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 17 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2017.
All research outputs
#6,588,671
of 25,502,817 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Pediatrics
#1,338
of 4,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,024
of 321,474 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Pediatrics
#14
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,502,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,432 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,474 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.