↓ Skip to main content

Gender and Age Differences in the Core Triad of Impairments in Autism Spectrum Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
7 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
412 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
684 Mendeley
Title
Gender and Age Differences in the Core Triad of Impairments in Autism Spectrum Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, August 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10803-013-1913-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Patricia J. M. Van Wijngaarden-Cremers, Evelien van Eeten, Wouter B. Groen, Patricia A. Van Deurzen, Iris J. Oosterling, Rutger Jan Van der Gaag

Abstract

Autism is an extensively studied disorder in which the gender disparity in prevalence has received much attention. In contrast, only a few studies examine gender differences in symptomatology. This systematic review and meta-analysis of 22 peer reviewed original publications examines gender differences in the core triad of impairments in autism. Gender differences were transformed and concatenated using standardized mean differences, and analyses were stratified in five age categories (toddlerhood, preschool children, childhood, adolescence, young adulthood). Boys showed more repetitive and stereotyped behavior as from the age of six, but not below the age of six. Males and females did not differ in the domain of social behavior and communication. There is an underrepresentation of females with ASD an average to high intelligence. Females could present another autistic phenotype than males. As ASD is now defined according to the male phenotype this could imply that there is an ascertainment bias. More research is needed into the female phenotype of ASD with development of appropriate instruments to detect and ascertain them.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 684 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 677 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 125 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 94 14%
Student > Bachelor 88 13%
Researcher 68 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 56 8%
Other 98 14%
Unknown 155 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 258 38%
Medicine and Dentistry 66 10%
Neuroscience 37 5%
Social Sciences 35 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 4%
Other 79 12%
Unknown 183 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 48. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2022.
All research outputs
#894,504
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#286
of 5,452 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,393
of 214,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#5
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,452 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 214,226 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.