Title |
Feasibility of full-thickness gastric resection using master and slave transluminal endoscopic robot and closure by overstitch: a preclinical study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Surgical Endoscopy, August 2013
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00464-013-3149-3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Philip W. Y. Chiu, S. J. Phee, Z. Wang, Z. Sun, Carmen C. Poon, T. Yamamoto, I. Penny, Jennie Y. Y. Wong, James Y. W. Lau, K. Y. Ho |
Abstract |
Gastric submucosal tumors are often treated by laparoscopic wedge resection. This study aimed to examine the feasibility of gastric full-thickness resection through a totally endoscopic approach using the master and slave transluminal endoscopic robot (MASTER), and closure of the luminal defect with an endoscopic suturing device. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 43 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 19% |
Student > Master | 7 | 16% |
Researcher | 4 | 9% |
Unspecified | 3 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 5% |
Other | 6 | 14% |
Unknown | 13 | 30% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 30% |
Engineering | 9 | 21% |
Unspecified | 3 | 7% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 16 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2013.
All research outputs
#18,345,822
of 22,719,618 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#4,736
of 6,008 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#149,316
of 199,827 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#46
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,719,618 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,008 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,827 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.