↓ Skip to main content

Defining Medical Futility and Improving Medical Care

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
133 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
162 Mendeley
Title
Defining Medical Futility and Improving Medical Care
Published in
Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, March 2011
DOI 10.1007/s11673-011-9293-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lawrence J. Schneiderman

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 162 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 162 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 17%
Student > Bachelor 24 15%
Other 16 10%
Researcher 16 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 9%
Other 42 26%
Unknown 23 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 79 49%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 12%
Social Sciences 7 4%
Psychology 5 3%
Philosophy 4 2%
Other 18 11%
Unknown 29 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2023.
All research outputs
#14,091,101
of 24,671,780 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Bioethical Inquiry
#352
of 641 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,734
of 112,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Bioethical Inquiry
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,671,780 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 641 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 112,951 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them