↓ Skip to main content

Nociceptors: a phylogenetic view

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Comparative Physiology A, October 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
24 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
199 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
415 Mendeley
Title
Nociceptors: a phylogenetic view
Published in
Journal of Comparative Physiology A, October 2009
DOI 10.1007/s00359-009-0482-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ewan St. John Smith, Gary R. Lewin

Abstract

The ability to react to environmental change is crucial for the survival of an organism and an essential prerequisite is the capacity to detect and respond to aversive stimuli. The importance of having an inbuilt "detect and protect" system is illustrated by the fact that most animals have dedicated sensory afferents which respond to noxious stimuli called nociceptors. Should injury occur there is often sensitization, whereby increased nociceptor sensitivity and/or plasticity of nociceptor-related neural circuits acts as a protection mechanism for the afflicted body part. Studying nociception and nociceptors in different model organisms has demonstrated that there are similarities from invertebrates right through to humans. The development of technology to genetically manipulate organisms, especially mice, has led to an understanding of some of the key molecular players in nociceptor function. This review will focus on what is known about nociceptors throughout the Animalia kingdom and what similarities exist across phyla; especially at the molecular level of ion channels.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 415 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 7 2%
United States 6 1%
United Kingdom 6 1%
Portugal 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 388 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 80 19%
Researcher 63 15%
Student > Bachelor 58 14%
Student > Master 54 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 18 4%
Other 70 17%
Unknown 72 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 120 29%
Neuroscience 62 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 45 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 24 6%
Psychology 14 3%
Other 69 17%
Unknown 81 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2024.
All research outputs
#2,174,087
of 25,709,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Comparative Physiology A
#117
of 1,559 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,917
of 107,488 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Comparative Physiology A
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,709,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,559 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,488 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.