↓ Skip to main content

Biodiversity, bioactive natural products and biotechnological potential of plant-associated endophytic actinobacteria

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, October 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
320 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
444 Mendeley
Title
Biodiversity, bioactive natural products and biotechnological potential of plant-associated endophytic actinobacteria
Published in
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, October 2010
DOI 10.1007/s00253-010-2923-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sheng Qin, Ke Xing, Ji-Hong Jiang, Li-Hua Xu, Wen-Jun Li

Abstract

Endophytic actinobacteria, which exist in the inner tissues of living plants, have attracted increasing attention among taxonomists, ecologists, agronomists, chemists and evolutionary biologists. Numerous studies have indicated that these prolific actinobacteria appear to have a capacity to produce an impressive array of secondary metabolites exhibiting a wide variety of biological activity, such as antibiotics, antitumor and anti-infection agents, plant growth promoters and enzymes, and may contribute to their host plants by promoting growth and enhancing their ability of withstanding the environmental stresses. These microorganisms may represent an underexplored reservoir of novel species of potential interest in the discovery of novel lead compounds and for exploitation in pharmaceutical, agriculture and industry. This review focuses on new findings in the isolation methods, bio- and chemical diversity of endophytic actinobacteria and reveals the potential biotechnological application. The facing problems and strategies for biodiversity research and bioactive natural products producing are also discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 444 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
India 3 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Argentina 2 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Saudi Arabia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Other 4 <1%
Unknown 425 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 91 20%
Student > Master 68 15%
Researcher 60 14%
Student > Bachelor 44 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 28 6%
Other 90 20%
Unknown 63 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 208 47%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 54 12%
Environmental Science 28 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 18 4%
Chemistry 14 3%
Other 34 8%
Unknown 88 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2023.
All research outputs
#6,908,521
of 24,119,703 outputs
Outputs from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#2,404
of 8,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,201
of 102,186 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#28
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,119,703 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,034 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 102,186 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.