↓ Skip to main content

Predictors of incident care service utilisation for mental health problems in the Dutch general population

Overview of attention for article published in Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, May 2001
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
Title
Predictors of incident care service utilisation for mental health problems in the Dutch general population
Published in
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, May 2001
DOI 10.1007/s001270050303
Pubmed ID
Authors

M. ten Have, W. Vollebergh, R. V. Bijl, R. de Graaf

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 5%
United Kingdom 1 3%
Unknown 37 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 25%
Student > Master 7 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Other 3 8%
Other 7 18%
Unknown 5 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 35%
Psychology 11 28%
Social Sciences 4 10%
Sports and Recreations 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 7 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2014.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
#1,439
of 2,715 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,305
of 42,351 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
#12
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,715 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 42,351 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.