↓ Skip to main content

Treatment with aspirin, NSAID, corticosteroids, and colchicine in acute and recurrent pericarditis

Overview of attention for article published in Heart Failure Reviews, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
70 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
Title
Treatment with aspirin, NSAID, corticosteroids, and colchicine in acute and recurrent pericarditis
Published in
Heart Failure Reviews, June 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10741-012-9328-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Massimo Imazio, Yehuda Adler

Abstract

Empiric anti-inflammatory therapy for acute and recurrent pericarditis is warranted for viral and idiopathic cases that represent most cases of pericarditis in developed countries. For specific uncomplicated etiologies, such as systemic autoimmune diseases and postpericardiotomy syndromes, the same drugs are also indicated. Aspirin and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) are mainstay of therapy with the possible adjunct of colchicine, especially for recurrences. Corticosteroids are a second choice for difficult cases requiring multi-drug therapies and specific medical conditions (i.e., specific cases with systemic autoimmune diseases, postpericardiotomy syndrome, and pregnancy). Medical therapy of pericarditis should be individualized as much as possible providing the attack dose every 8 h to ensure full daily control of symptoms and till remission and C-reactive protein normalization, and then tapering should be considered. The present paper will review current evidence for the treatment of acute and recurrent pericarditis with aspirin, NSAID, corticosteroids, and colchicine.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Unknown 69 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 14%
Student > Bachelor 10 14%
Researcher 8 11%
Other 6 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 8%
Other 16 23%
Unknown 15 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 59%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 20 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2013.
All research outputs
#18,345,822
of 22,719,618 outputs
Outputs from Heart Failure Reviews
#546
of 664 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,623
of 166,791 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Heart Failure Reviews
#5
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,719,618 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 664 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,791 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.