You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Alogliptin after Acute Coronary Syndrome in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
New England Journal of Medicine, September 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1056/nejmoa1305889 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
William B White, Christopher P Cannon, Simon R Heller, Steven E Nissen, Richard M Bergenstal, George L Bakris, Alfonso T Perez, Penny R Fleck, Cyrus R Mehta, Stuart Kupfer, Craig Wilson, William C Cushman, Faiez Zannad |
| Abstract |
To assess potentially elevated cardiovascular risk related to new antihyperglycemic drugs in patients with type 2 diabetes, regulatory agencies require a comprehensive evaluation of the cardiovascular safety profile of new antidiabetic therapies. We assessed cardiovascular outcomes with alogliptin, a new inhibitor of dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4), as compared with placebo in patients with type 2 diabetes who had had a recent acute coronary syndrome. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 59 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 8 | 14% |
| Japan | 5 | 8% |
| Indonesia | 2 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 3% |
| Argentina | 2 | 3% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Colombia | 1 | 2% |
| Chile | 1 | 2% |
| El Salvador | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 12% |
| Unknown | 29 | 49% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 54 | 92% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 3% |
| Scientists | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 947 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | <1% |
| Spain | 6 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 3 | <1% |
| Germany | 3 | <1% |
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| Japan | 3 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 2 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 7 | <1% |
| Unknown | 910 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 132 | 14% |
| Other | 117 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 95 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 79 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 72 | 8% |
| Other | 250 | 26% |
| Unknown | 202 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 491 | 52% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 64 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 48 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 30 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 2% |
| Other | 59 | 6% |
| Unknown | 235 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 777. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2024.
All research outputs
#25,154
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#1,032
of 32,687 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111
of 213,643 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#5
of 294 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,687 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 122.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,643 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 294 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.