You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Red alert for women's heart: the urgent need for more research and knowledge on cardiovascular disease in womenProceedings of the Workshop held in Brussels on Gender Differences in Cardiovascular disease, 29 September 2010
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Heart Journal, March 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr048 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Angela H.E.M. Maas, Yvonne T. van der Schouw, Vera Regitz-Zagrosek, Eva Swahn, Yolande E. Appelman, Gerard Pasterkamp, Hugo ten Cate, Peter M. Nilsson, Menno V. Huisman, Hans C.G. Stam, Karin Eizema, Marco Stramba-Badiale |
| Abstract |
A recent report of the EuroHeart project has shown that women are still underrepresented in many cardiovascular clinical trials, while important gender differences are present within most areas of heart disease. As the burden of cardiovascular disease is increasing in middle-aged women relative to men, a more profound understanding is needed of the fundamental biological differences that exist between men and women. In the current review, we aim to address the need for more explanatory sex-specific cardiovascular research to be able to adapt existing guidelines for a better heart health in women. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 58 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 6 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 9% |
| Turkey | 2 | 3% |
| United States | 2 | 3% |
| Romania | 2 | 3% |
| Poland | 2 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Greece | 1 | 2% |
| Guyana | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 32 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 41 | 71% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 11 | 19% |
| Scientists | 3 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 75 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 18% |
| Unknown | 21 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 37 | 47% |
| Psychology | 5 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 21 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1057. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2021.
All research outputs
#15,012
of 25,718,113 outputs
Outputs from European Heart Journal
#39
of 11,216 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26
of 119,940 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Heart Journal
#1
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,718,113 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,216 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 119,940 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.