↓ Skip to main content

The Biomechanical Differences Between Barefoot and Shod Distance Running: A Systematic Review and Preliminary Meta-Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Sports Medicine, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
46 X users
facebook
7 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
video
3 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
107 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
597 Mendeley
Title
The Biomechanical Differences Between Barefoot and Shod Distance Running: A Systematic Review and Preliminary Meta-Analysis
Published in
Sports Medicine, August 2013
DOI 10.1007/s40279-013-0084-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jonathan P. L. Hall, Christian Barton, Paul Remy Jones, Dylan Morrissey

Abstract

Distance running continues to experience increased participation in the Western world, although it is associated with high injury rates. Barefoot running has been increasingly proposed as a means to prevent overuse injury due to various biomechanical differences, including reduced joint loading rates and altered kinematics and muscle activity patterns compared to shod running.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 46 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 597 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 <1%
Netherlands 3 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
Denmark 2 <1%
South Africa 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Other 4 <1%
Unknown 573 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 119 20%
Student > Bachelor 114 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 55 9%
Researcher 39 7%
Student > Postgraduate 30 5%
Other 117 20%
Unknown 123 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 177 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 136 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 58 10%
Engineering 22 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 3%
Other 40 7%
Unknown 146 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 61. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2023.
All research outputs
#674,543
of 24,873,243 outputs
Outputs from Sports Medicine
#632
of 2,873 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,475
of 206,449 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sports Medicine
#8
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,873,243 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,873 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,449 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.