↓ Skip to main content

Climate Consensus and ‘Misinformation’: A Rejoinder to Agnotology, Scientific Consensus, and the Teaching and Learning of Climate Change

Overview of attention for article published in Science & Education, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#1 of 803)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
blogs
9 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
391 X users
facebook
18 Facebook pages
googleplus
5 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
109 Mendeley
Title
Climate Consensus and ‘Misinformation’: A Rejoinder to Agnotology, Scientific Consensus, and the Teaching and Learning of Climate Change
Published in
Science & Education, August 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11191-013-9647-9
Authors

David R. Legates, Willie Soon, William M. Briggs, Christopher Monckton of Brenchley

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 391 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 2 2%
Brazil 2 2%
United States 2 2%
Canada 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 100 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 18%
Researcher 17 16%
Student > Master 14 13%
Student > Bachelor 11 10%
Professor 6 6%
Other 23 21%
Unknown 18 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 16 15%
Environmental Science 8 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 6%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 6%
Psychology 6 6%
Other 46 42%
Unknown 20 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 423. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2024.
All research outputs
#69,636
of 25,746,891 outputs
Outputs from Science & Education
#1
of 803 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#407
of 212,774 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science & Education
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,746,891 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 803 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,774 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them