| Title |
How to Improve the Efficiency of Randomised Response Designs
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Quality & Quantity, June 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11135-004-0432-3 |
| Authors |
Gerty J. L. M. Lensvelt-Mulders, Joop J. Hox, Peter G. M. van der Heijden |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 2 | 2% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 75 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 12% |
| Researcher | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 20 | 25% |
| Unknown | 18 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 14 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 16% |
| Environmental Science | 11 | 14% |
| Psychology | 5 | 6% |
| Engineering | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 17% |
| Unknown | 20 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2016.
All research outputs
#7,523,397
of 22,959,818 outputs
Outputs from Quality & Quantity
#199
of 610 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,419
of 57,498 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Quality & Quantity
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,959,818 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 610 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 57,498 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.