| Title |
Intensive care medicine research agenda on cardiac arrest
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, March 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00134-017-4739-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jerry P. Nolan, Robert A. Berg, Stephen Bernard, Bentley J. Bobrow, Clifton W. Callaway, Tobias Cronberg, Rudolph W. Koster, Peter J. Kudenchuk, Graham Nichol, Gavin D. Perkins, Tom D. Rea, Claudio Sandroni, Jasmeet Soar, Kjetil Sunde, Alain Cariou |
| Abstract |
Over the last 15 years, treatment of comatose post-cardiac arrest patients has evolved to include therapeutic strategies such as urgent coronary angiography with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), targeted temperature management (TTM)-requiring mechanical ventilation and sedation-and more sophisticated and cautious prognostication. In 2015, collaboration between the European Resuscitation Council (ERC) and the European Society for Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM) resulted in the first European guidelines on post-resuscitation care. This review addresses the major recent advances in the treatment of cardiac arrest, recent trials that have challenged current practice and the remaining areas of uncertainty. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 20% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 10% |
| Italy | 1 | 10% |
| Spain | 1 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 10% |
| Scientists | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 115 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 10% |
| Other | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 34 | 30% |
| Unknown | 33 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 44 | 38% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 12% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Unknown | 39 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2017.
All research outputs
#5,586,453
of 22,959,818 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#2,427
of 5,005 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,645
of 308,253 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#93
of 123 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,959,818 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,005 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 308,253 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 123 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.