Title |
Harmonizing international trials of early goal-directed resuscitation for severe sepsis and septic shock: methodology of ProCESS, ARISE, and ProMISe
|
---|---|
Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, August 2013
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00134-013-3024-7 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
The ProCESS/ARISE/ProMISe Methodology Writing Committee |
Abstract |
To describe and compare the design of three independent but collaborating multicenter trials of early goal-directed resuscitation for severe sepsis and septic shock. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 4 | 33% |
United Kingdom | 3 | 25% |
United States | 2 | 17% |
New Zealand | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 2 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 8 | 67% |
Scientists | 3 | 25% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Turkey | 1 | <1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Mexico | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Japan | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 110 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Postgraduate | 18 | 15% |
Other | 17 | 14% |
Researcher | 15 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 10% |
Student > Master | 12 | 10% |
Other | 28 | 24% |
Unknown | 16 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 80 | 68% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 4% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 2% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 2% |
Other | 5 | 4% |
Unknown | 22 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2015.
All research outputs
#1,732,167
of 25,257,066 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#1,441
of 5,384 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,661
of 205,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#1
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,257,066 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,384 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,986 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.