| Title |
An introduction to markers, quantitative trait loci (QTL) mapping and marker-assisted selection for crop improvement: The basic concepts
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Euphytica, January 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10681-005-1681-5 |
| Authors |
B. C. Y. Collard, M. Z. Z. Jahufer, J. B. Brouwer, E. C. K. Pang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3,033 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 27 | <1% |
| United States | 16 | <1% |
| Argentina | 12 | <1% |
| India | 11 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 10 | <1% |
| Colombia | 8 | <1% |
| France | 7 | <1% |
| Germany | 7 | <1% |
| Philippines | 7 | <1% |
| Other | 61 | 2% |
| Unknown | 2867 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 695 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 531 | 18% |
| Researcher | 526 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 236 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 189 | 6% |
| Other | 412 | 14% |
| Unknown | 444 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2062 | 68% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 316 | 10% |
| Environmental Science | 40 | 1% |
| Computer Science | 30 | <1% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | <1% |
| Other | 98 | 3% |
| Unknown | 470 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2022.
All research outputs
#2,390,117
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Euphytica
#40
of 1,315 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,896
of 155,260 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Euphytica
#1
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,315 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,260 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.