↓ Skip to main content

A review of the preventability of maternal mortality in one hospital system in Louisiana, USA

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A review of the preventability of maternal mortality in one hospital system in Louisiana, USA
Published in
International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, January 2017
DOI 10.1002/ijgo.12074
Pubmed ID
Authors

James J. Morong, Jane K. Martin, Robert S. Ware, Alfred G. Robichaux

Abstract

To determine preventability of in-hospital maternal mortality in the Ochsner Health System (OHS) in the US state of Louisiana. A retrospective study was undertaken of all known cases of in-hospital maternal death (during pregnancy or within 42 days of termination) that occurred within OHS facilities in 1995-2013. Associations between characteristics and mortality and preventability were investigated. Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) were calculated in view of varying reference values. Among 16 eligible deaths, 12 (75%) were deemed potentially preventable. The incidences of overall and preventable maternal death were higher if the patient had late entry to prenatal care (IRR 6.3 [P=0.004] and 8.8 [P=0.004], respectively). Maternal mortality was increased if the patient had required transfer to the OHS (IRR 15.8 [P<0.001] overall and 15.8 [P=0.002] for preventable mortality). Deaths of patients with private insurance were more likely to be not preventable than were those of patients without such insurance (P=0.003). Uninsured patients had the highest MMR, with an IRR of 13.8 (P=0.014) when compared with Medicaid patients. The factors most predictive of mortality were late entry to prenatal care, critical status requiring transfer from an outside facility, and non-private insurance status.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 16%
Student > Master 5 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 14%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Lecturer 2 5%
Other 6 16%
Unknown 9 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 24%
Social Sciences 5 14%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 10 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2017.
All research outputs
#19,578,187
of 24,080,653 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
#3,546
of 4,000 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#320,366
of 428,841 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
#188
of 207 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,080,653 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,000 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,841 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 207 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.