↓ Skip to main content

Comorbid Psychiatric Disorders in Children with Autism: Interview Development and Rates of Disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, July 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
6 X users
patent
42 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
1323 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1018 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Comorbid Psychiatric Disorders in Children with Autism: Interview Development and Rates of Disorders
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, July 2006
DOI 10.1007/s10803-006-0123-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ovsanna T. Leyfer, Susan E. Folstein, Susan Bacalman, Naomi O. Davis, Elena Dinh, Jubel Morgan, Helen Tager-Flusberg, Janet E. Lainhart

Abstract

The Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia was modified for use in children and adolescents with autism by developing additional screening questions and coding options that reflect the presentation of psychiatric disorders in autism spectrum disorders. The modified instrument, the Autism Comorbidity Interview-Present and Lifetime Version (ACI-PL), was piloted and frequently diagnosed disorders, depression, ADHD, and OCD, were tested for reliability and validity. The ACI-PL provides reliable DSM diagnoses that are valid based on clinical psychiatric diagnosis and treatment history. The sample demonstrated a high prevalence of specific phobia, obsessive compulsive disorder, and ADHD. The rates of psychiatric disorder in autism are high and are associated with functional impairment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,018 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 11 1%
United Kingdom 7 <1%
Canada 4 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 987 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 180 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 151 15%
Researcher 120 12%
Student > Bachelor 119 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 91 9%
Other 179 18%
Unknown 178 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 394 39%
Medicine and Dentistry 142 14%
Neuroscience 54 5%
Social Sciences 53 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 40 4%
Other 121 12%
Unknown 214 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2023.
All research outputs
#1,772,088
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#719
of 5,491 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,363
of 95,161 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#6
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,491 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,161 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.