| Title |
Economic Linkages to Changing Landscapes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Management, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00267-013-0116-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jeffrey M. Peterson, Marcellus M. Caldas, Jason S. Bergtold, Belinda S. Sturm, Russell W. Graves, Dietrich Earnhart, Eric A. Hanley, J. Christopher Brown |
| Abstract |
Many economic processes are intertwined with landscape change. A large number of individual economic decisions shape the landscape, and in turn the changes in the landscape shape economic decisions. This article describes key research questions about the economics of landscape change and reviews the state of research knowledge. The rich and varied economic-landscape interactions are an active area of research by economists, geographers, and others. Because the interactions are numerous and complex, disentangling the causal relationships in any given landscape system is a formidable research challenge. Limited data with mismatched temporal and spatial scales present further obstacles. Nevertheless, the growing body of economic research on these topics is advancing and shares fundamental challenges, as well as data and methods, with work in other disciplines. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 7% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 64 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 16% |
| Researcher | 9 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 12% |
| Professor | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 20 | 27% |
| Unknown | 11 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 19 | 26% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 15% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 7 | 9% |
| Engineering | 6 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 19 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2013.
All research outputs
#15,517,312
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Management
#1,373
of 1,914 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,484
of 206,465 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Management
#15
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,914 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,465 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.