↓ Skip to main content

Future reef decalcification under a business-as-usual CO2 emission scenario

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
4 policy sources
twitter
9 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
149 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
346 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Future reef decalcification under a business-as-usual CO2 emission scenario
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, September 2013
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1302701110
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sophie G. Dove, David I. Kline, Olga Pantos, Florent E. Angly, Gene W. Tyson, Ove Hoegh-Guldberg

Abstract

Increasing atmospheric partial pressure of CO2 (pCO2) is a major threat to coral reefs, but some argue that the threat is mitigated by factors such as the variability in the response of coral calcification to acidification, differences in bleaching susceptibility, and the potential for rapid adaptation to anthropogenic warming. However the evidence for these mitigating factors tends to involve experimental studies on corals, as opposed to coral reefs, and rarely includes the influence of multiple variables (e.g., temperature and acidification) within regimes that include diurnal and seasonal variability. Here, we demonstrate that the inclusion of all these factors results in the decalcification of patch-reefs under business-as-usual scenarios and reduced, although positive, calcification under reduced-emission scenarios. Primary productivity was found to remain constant across all scenarios, despite significant bleaching and coral mortality under both future scenarios. Daylight calcification decreased and nocturnal decalcification increased sharply from the preindustrial and control conditions to the future scenarios of low (reduced emissions) and high (business-as-usual) increases in pCO2. These changes coincided with deeply negative carbonate budgets, a shift toward smaller carbonate sediments, and an increase in the abundance of sediment microbes under the business-as-usual emission scenario. Experimental coral reefs demonstrated highest net calcification rates and lowest rates of coral mortality under preindustrial conditions, suggesting that reef processes may not have been able to keep pace with the relatively minor environmental changes that have occurred during the last century. Taken together, our results have serious implications for the future of coral reefs under business-as-usual environmental changes projected for the coming decades and century.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 346 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 1%
Germany 3 <1%
Australia 3 <1%
Brazil 3 <1%
Mexico 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 325 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 66 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 64 18%
Student > Master 49 14%
Student > Bachelor 46 13%
Other 15 4%
Other 48 14%
Unknown 58 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 128 37%
Environmental Science 78 23%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 32 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 3%
Engineering 6 2%
Other 20 6%
Unknown 70 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 104. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2023.
All research outputs
#413,050
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#7,382
of 104,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,989
of 213,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#84
of 885 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 104,451 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,132 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 885 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.