↓ Skip to main content

Application of the ELOHA Framework to Regulated Rivers in the Upper Tennessee River Basin: A Case Study

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Management, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
68 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
119 Mendeley
Title
Application of the ELOHA Framework to Regulated Rivers in the Upper Tennessee River Basin: A Case Study
Published in
Environmental Management, April 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00267-013-0055-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ryan A. McManamay, Donald J. Orth, Charles A. Dolloff, David C. Mathews

Abstract

In order for habitat restoration in regulated rivers to be effective at large scales, broadly applicable frameworks are needed that provide measurable objectives and contexts for management. The Ecological Limits of Hydrologic Alteration (ELOHA) framework was created as a template to assess hydrologic alterations, develop relationships between altered streamflow and ecology, and establish environmental flow standards. We tested the utility of ELOHA in informing flow restoration applications for fish and riparian communities in regulated rivers in the Upper Tennessee River Basin (UTRB). We followed the steps of ELOHA to generate univariate relationships between altered flows and ecology within the UTRB. By comparison, we constructed multivariate models to determine improvements in predictive capacity with the addition of non-flow variables. We then determined whether those relationships could predict fish and riparian responses to flow restoration in the Cheoah River, a regulated system within the UTRB. Although ELOHA provided a robust template to construct hydrologic information and predict hydrology for ungaged locations, our results do not suggest that univariate relationships between flow and ecology (step 4, ELOHA process) can produce results sufficient to guide flow restoration in regulated rivers. After constructing multivariate models, we successfully developed predictive relationships between flow alterations and fish/riparian responses. In accordance with model predictions, riparian encroachment displayed consistent decreases with increases in flow magnitude in the Cheoah River; however, fish richness did not increase as predicted 4 years after restoration. Our results suggest that altered temperature and substrate and the current disturbance regime may have reduced opportunities for fish species colonization. Our case study highlights the need for interdisciplinary science in defining environmental flows for regulated rivers and the need for adaptive management approaches once flows are restored.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 4%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Unknown 111 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 31 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 24%
Student > Master 21 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 5%
Professor 5 4%
Other 15 13%
Unknown 13 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 41 34%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 17%
Engineering 19 16%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 10 8%
Computer Science 1 <1%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 21 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2017.
All research outputs
#8,186,806
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Management
#699
of 1,914 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,189
of 204,848 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Management
#10
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,914 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 204,848 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.