You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Prevalence and Control of Diabetes in Chinese Adults
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, September 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1001/jama.2013.168118 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yu Xu, Limin Wang, Jiang He, Yufang Bi, Mian Li, Tiange Wang, Linhong Wang, Yong Jiang, Meng Dai, Jieli Lu, Min Xu, Yichong Li, Nan Hu, Jianhong Li, Shengquan Mi, Chung-Shiuan Chen, Guangwei Li, Yiming Mu, Jiajun Zhao, Lingzhi Kong, Jialun Chen, Shenghan Lai, Weiqing Wang, Wenhua Zhao, Guang Ning |
| Abstract |
Noncommunicable chronic diseases have become the leading causes of mortality and disease burden worldwide. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 75 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 14 | 19% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 9% |
| Spain | 4 | 5% |
| Argentina | 2 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 3% |
| Slovenia | 1 | 1% |
| Denmark | 1 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 37 | 49% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 53 | 71% |
| Scientists | 10 | 13% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 710 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Macao | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Peru | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Thailand | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 698 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 101 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 91 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 84 | 12% |
| Researcher | 67 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 53 | 7% |
| Other | 114 | 16% |
| Unknown | 200 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 185 | 26% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 61 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 46 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 44 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 25 | 4% |
| Other | 121 | 17% |
| Unknown | 228 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 398. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2023.
All research outputs
#76,737
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#1,379
of 36,682 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#459
of 209,650 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#10
of 332 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 36,682 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 72.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,650 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 332 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.