↓ Skip to main content

Closed Basin Brine Evolution and the Influence of Ca–Cl Inflow Waters: Death Valley and Bristol Dry Lake California, Qaidam Basin, China, and Salar de Atacama, Chile

Overview of attention for article published in Aquatic Geochemistry, December 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
111 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
Title
Closed Basin Brine Evolution and the Influence of Ca–Cl Inflow Waters: Death Valley and Bristol Dry Lake California, Qaidam Basin, China, and Salar de Atacama, Chile
Published in
Aquatic Geochemistry, December 2008
DOI 10.1007/s10498-008-9046-z
Authors

Tim K. Lowenstein, François Risacher

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 83 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 19%
Researcher 13 16%
Student > Master 12 14%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Other 15 18%
Unknown 14 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 36 43%
Environmental Science 13 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 6%
Engineering 4 5%
Unspecified 2 2%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 18 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 December 2021.
All research outputs
#7,454,066
of 22,788,370 outputs
Outputs from Aquatic Geochemistry
#26
of 84 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,659
of 166,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Aquatic Geochemistry
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,788,370 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 84 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,226 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them