↓ Skip to main content

De novo post-illumination monoterpene burst in Quercus ilex (holm oak)

Overview of attention for article published in Planta, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
Title
De novo post-illumination monoterpene burst in Quercus ilex (holm oak)
Published in
Planta, December 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00425-016-2636-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

K. G. Srikanta Dani, Giovanni Marino, Cosimo Taiti, Stefano Mancuso, Brian J. Atwell, Francesco Loreto, Mauro Centritto

Abstract

Explicit proof for de novo origin of a rare post-illumination monoterpene burst and its consistency under low O 2 , shows interaction of photorespiration, photosynthesis, and isoprenoid biosynthesis during light-dark transitions. Quercus ilex L (holm oak) constitutively emits foliar monoterpenes in an isoprene-like fashion via the methyl erythritol phosphate (MEP) pathway located in chloroplasts. Isoprene-emitting plants are known to exhibit post-illumination isoprene burst, a transient emission of isoprene in darkness. An analogous post-illumination monoterpene burst (PiMB) had remained elusive and is reported here for the first time in Q. ilex. Using (13)CO2 labelling, we show that PiMB is made from freshly fixed carbon. PiMB is rare at ambient (20%) O2, absent at high (50%) O2, and becomes consistent in leaves exposed to low (2%) O2. PiMB is stronger and occurs earlier at higher temperatures. We also show that primary and secondary post-illumination CO 2 bursts (PiCO2B) are sensitive to O2 in Q. ilex. The primary photorespiratory PiCO2B is absent under both ambient and low O2, but is induced under high (>50%) O2, while the secondary PiCO2B (of unknown origin) is absent under ambient, but present at low and high O2. We propose that post-illumination recycling of photorespired CO2 competes with the MEP pathway for photosynthetic carbon and energy, making PiMB rare under ambient O2 and absent at high O2. PiMB becomes consistent when photorespiration is suppressed in Q. ilex.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 7%
Unknown 13 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 36%
Student > Postgraduate 3 21%
Other 2 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 50%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 7%
Unknown 5 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2017.
All research outputs
#14,337,934
of 22,959,818 outputs
Outputs from Planta
#1,731
of 2,730 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#230,357
of 420,809 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Planta
#5
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,959,818 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,730 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,809 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.