Title |
What is brain fog? An evaluation of the symptom in postural tachycardia syndrome
|
---|---|
Published in |
Clinical Autonomic Research, September 2013
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10286-013-0212-z |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Amanda J. Ross, Marvin S. Medow, Peter C. Rowe, Julian M. Stewart |
Abstract |
Adolescents with postural tachycardia syndrome (POTS) often experience ill-defined cognitive impairment referred to by patients as "brain fog." The objective of this study was to evaluate the symptom of brain fog as a means of gaining further insight into its etiology and potential palliative interventions. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 5 | 15% |
United States | 5 | 15% |
Pakistan | 1 | 3% |
Australia | 1 | 3% |
Finland | 1 | 3% |
Saudi Arabia | 1 | 3% |
India | 1 | 3% |
Spain | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 18 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 30 | 88% |
Scientists | 3 | 9% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 171 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 2% |
Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
Norway | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 166 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 26 | 15% |
Researcher | 23 | 13% |
Student > Master | 22 | 13% |
Other | 14 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 8% |
Other | 21 | 12% |
Unknown | 51 | 30% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 20% |
Psychology | 19 | 11% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 8% |
Neuroscience | 8 | 5% |
Sports and Recreations | 6 | 4% |
Other | 29 | 17% |
Unknown | 62 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 56. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2024.
All research outputs
#767,665
of 25,715,849 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Autonomic Research
#24
of 863 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,173
of 209,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Autonomic Research
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,715,849 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 863 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,806 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them