↓ Skip to main content

Cryptic female choice favours sperm from major histocompatibility complex-dissimilar males

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
117 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
185 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cryptic female choice favours sperm from major histocompatibility complex-dissimilar males
Published in
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, October 2013
DOI 10.1098/rspb.2013.1296
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hanne Løvlie, Mark A. F. Gillingham, Kirsty Worley, Tommaso Pizzari, David S. Richardson

Abstract

Cryptic female choice may enable polyandrous females to avoid inbreeding or bias offspring variability at key loci after mating. However, the role of these genetic benefits in cryptic female choice remains poorly understood. Female red junglefowl, Gallus gallus, bias sperm use in favour of unrelated males. Here, we experimentally investigate whether this bias is driven by relatedness per se, or by similarity at the major histocompatibility complex (MHC), genes central to vertebrate acquired immunity, where polymorphism is critical to an individual's ability to combat pathogens. Through experimentally controlled natural matings, we confirm that selection against related males' sperm occurs within the female reproductive tract but demonstrate that this is more accurately predicted by MHC similarity: controlling for relatedness per se, more sperm reached the eggs when partners were MHC--dissimilar. Importantly, this effect appeared largely owing to similarity at a single MHC locus (class I minor). Further, the effect of MHC similarity was lost following artificial insemination, suggesting that male phenotypic cues might be required for females to select sperm differentially. These results indicate that postmating mechanisms that reduce inbreeding may do so as a consequence of more specific strategies of cryptic female choice promoting MHC diversity in offspring.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 185 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
United Kingdom 3 2%
Germany 2 1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Romania 1 <1%
Unknown 171 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 46 25%
Student > Bachelor 34 18%
Researcher 26 14%
Student > Master 14 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 5%
Other 31 17%
Unknown 25 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 112 61%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 9%
Environmental Science 5 3%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 4 2%
Psychology 3 2%
Other 7 4%
Unknown 38 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 98. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2020.
All research outputs
#430,368
of 25,411,814 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#1,081
of 11,347 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,379
of 224,798 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#15
of 131 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,411,814 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,347 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,798 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 131 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.