↓ Skip to main content

Pacing and Awareness: Brain Regulation of Physical Activity

Overview of attention for article published in Sports Medicine, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
29 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
121 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
186 Mendeley
Title
Pacing and Awareness: Brain Regulation of Physical Activity
Published in
Sports Medicine, August 2013
DOI 10.1007/s40279-013-0091-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

A. M. Edwards, R. C. J. Polman

Abstract

The aim of this current opinion article is to provide a contemporary perspective on the role of brain regulatory control of paced performances in response to exercise challenges. There has been considerable recent conjecture as to the role of the brain during exercise, and it is now broadly accepted that fatigue does not occur without brain involvement and that all voluntary activity is likely to be paced at some level by the brain according to individualised priorities and knowledge of personal capabilities. This article examines the role of pacing in managing and distributing effort to successfully accomplish physical tasks, while extending existing theories on the role of the brain as a central controller of performance. The opinion proposed in this article is that a central regulator operates to control exercise performance but achieves this without the requirement of an intelligent central governor located in the subconscious brain. It seems likely that brain regulation operates at different levels of awareness, such that minor homeostatic challenges are addressed automatically without conscious awareness, while larger metabolic disturbances attract conscious awareness and evoke a behavioural response. This supports the view that the brain regulates exercise performance but that the interpretation of the mechanisms underlying this effect have not yet been fully elucidated.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 186 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 178 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 39 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 16%
Student > Bachelor 24 13%
Researcher 21 11%
Student > Postgraduate 9 5%
Other 39 21%
Unknown 24 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 83 45%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 5%
Psychology 9 5%
Neuroscience 8 4%
Other 24 13%
Unknown 42 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2018.
All research outputs
#1,854,737
of 24,820,264 outputs
Outputs from Sports Medicine
#1,329
of 2,870 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,001
of 206,075 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sports Medicine
#16
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,820,264 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,870 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 54.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,075 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.