↓ Skip to main content

Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria are more effective under drought: a meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Plant and Soil, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#35 of 3,276)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
12 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
169 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
330 Mendeley
Title
Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria are more effective under drought: a meta-analysis
Published in
Plant and Soil, March 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11104-017-3199-8
Authors

Rachel L. Rubin, Kees Jan van Groenigen, Bruce A. Hungate

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 330 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 329 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 82 25%
Researcher 41 12%
Student > Master 36 11%
Student > Bachelor 26 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 6%
Other 45 14%
Unknown 81 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 151 46%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 31 9%
Environmental Science 20 6%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 2%
Other 14 4%
Unknown 103 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2021.
All research outputs
#1,006,776
of 24,397,600 outputs
Outputs from Plant and Soil
#35
of 3,276 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,092
of 312,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant and Soil
#3
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,397,600 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,276 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,244 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.