| Title |
68Ga-PSMA PET/CT: Joint EANM and SNMMI procedure guideline for prostate cancer imaging: version 1.0
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, March 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00259-017-3670-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Wolfgang P. Fendler, Matthias Eiber, Mohsen Beheshti, Jamshed Bomanji, Francesco Ceci, Steven Cho, Frederik Giesel, Uwe Haberkorn, Thomas A. Hope, Klaus Kopka, Bernd J. Krause, Felix M. Mottaghy, Heiko Schöder, John Sunderland, Simon Wan, Hans-Jürgen Wester, Stefano Fanti, Ken Herrmann |
| Abstract |
The aim of this guideline is to provide standards for the recommendation, performance, interpretation and reporting of (68)Ga-PSMA PET/CT for prostate cancer imaging. These recommendations will help to improve accuracy, precision, and repeatability of (68)Ga-PSMA PET/CT for prostate cancer essentially needed for implementation of this modality in science and routine clinical practice. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Saudi Arabia | 2 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 25% |
| Spain | 1 | 13% |
| India | 1 | 13% |
| Austria | 1 | 13% |
| United States | 1 | 13% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 63% |
| Scientists | 2 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 488 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 487 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 69 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 54 | 11% |
| Other | 46 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 42 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 41 | 8% |
| Other | 89 | 18% |
| Unknown | 147 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 198 | 41% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 27 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 15 | 3% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 14 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 2% |
| Other | 59 | 12% |
| Unknown | 164 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 80. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2024.
All research outputs
#539,464
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
#21
of 3,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,181
of 323,231 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
#1
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,565 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,231 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.