↓ Skip to main content

Interventions to mitigate the effects of poverty and inequality on mental health

Overview of attention for article published in Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
20 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
388 Mendeley
Title
Interventions to mitigate the effects of poverty and inequality on mental health
Published in
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, March 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00127-017-1370-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kristian Wahlbeck, Johanna Cresswell-Smith, Peija Haaramo, Johannes Parkkonen

Abstract

To review psychosocial and policy interventions which mitigate the effects of poverty and inequality on mental health. Systematic reviews, controlled trials and realist evaluations of the last 10 years are reviewed, without age or geographical restrictions. Effective psychosocial interventions on individual and family level, such as parenting support programmes, exist. The evidence for mental health impact of broader community-based interventions, e.g. community outreach workers, or service-based interventions, e.g. social prescribing and debt advice is scarce. Likewise, the availability of evidence for the mental health impact of policy level interventions, such as poverty alleviation or youth guarantee, is quite restricted. The social, economic, and physical environments in which people live shape mental health and many common mental disorders. There are effective early interventions to promote mental health in vulnerable groups, but it is necessary to both initiate and facilitate a cross-sectoral approach, and to form partnerships between different government departments, civic society organisations and other stakeholders. This approach is referred to as Mental Health in All Policies and it can be applied to all public policy levels from local policies to supranational.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 388 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 388 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 61 16%
Researcher 45 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 43 11%
Student > Bachelor 31 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 6%
Other 60 15%
Unknown 126 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 65 17%
Psychology 45 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 43 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 42 11%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 13 3%
Other 29 7%
Unknown 151 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2022.
All research outputs
#2,140,636
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
#387
of 2,725 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,695
of 321,602 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
#11
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,725 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,602 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.