↓ Skip to main content

Metafounders are related to Fst fixation indices and reduce bias in single-step genomic evaluations

Overview of attention for article published in Genetics Selection Evolution, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
Title
Metafounders are related to Fst fixation indices and reduce bias in single-step genomic evaluations
Published in
Genetics Selection Evolution, March 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12711-017-0309-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carolina A. Garcia-Baccino, Andres Legarra, Ole F. Christensen, Ignacy Misztal, Ivan Pocrnic, Zulma G. Vitezica, Rodolfo J. C. Cantet

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 55 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 18%
Researcher 9 16%
Student > Master 7 13%
Professor 4 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 12 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 53%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 9%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 2%
Sports and Recreations 1 2%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 16 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2017.
All research outputs
#8,499,896
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Genetics Selection Evolution
#299
of 837 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,319
of 325,093 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genetics Selection Evolution
#8
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 837 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,093 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.