↓ Skip to main content

On the fundamental difference between coal rank and coal type

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Coal Geology, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
259 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
281 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
On the fundamental difference between coal rank and coal type
Published in
International Journal of Coal Geology, October 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.coal.2013.08.007
Authors

Jennifer M.K. O'Keefe, Achim Bechtel, Kimon Christanis, Shifeng Dai, William A. DiMichele, Cortland F. Eble, Joan S. Esterle, Maria Mastalerz, Anne L. Raymond, Bruno V. Valentim, Nicola J. Wagner, Colin R. Ward, James C. Hower

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 281 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 2 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Philippines 1 <1%
Unknown 273 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 46 16%
Researcher 37 13%
Student > Master 32 11%
Student > Bachelor 29 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 5%
Other 54 19%
Unknown 68 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 55 20%
Engineering 49 17%
Chemical Engineering 23 8%
Environmental Science 15 5%
Energy 14 5%
Other 34 12%
Unknown 91 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2013.
All research outputs
#14,783,688
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Coal Geology
#323
of 484 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,957
of 219,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Coal Geology
#6
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 484 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 219,852 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.