↓ Skip to main content

Predictors of outcome in Internet-based cognitive behavior therapy for severe health anxiety

Overview of attention for article published in Behaviour Research & Therapy, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
145 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Predictors of outcome in Internet-based cognitive behavior therapy for severe health anxiety
Published in
Behaviour Research & Therapy, August 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.brat.2013.07.009
Pubmed ID
Authors

Erik Hedman, Nils Lindefors, Gerhard Andersson, Erik Andersson, Mats Lekander, Christian Rück, Brjánn Ljótsson

Abstract

Internet-based cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) for severe health anxiety can be effective, but not all patients achieve full remission. Under these circumstances, knowledge about predictors is essential for the clinician in order to make reliable treatment recommendations. The primary aim of this study was to investigate clinical, demographic, and therapy process-related predictors of Internet-based CBT for severe health anxiety. We performed three types of analyses on data from a sample comprising participants (N = 81) who had received Internet-based CBT in a randomized controlled trial. Outcomes were a) end state health anxiety, b) improvement in health anxiety (continuous change scores), and c) clinically significant improvement. Outcomes were assessed at six-month follow-up. The results showed that the most stable predictors of both end state health anxiety and improvement were baseline health anxiety and depressive symptoms. Treatment adherence, i.e. the number of completed treatment modules, also significantly predicted outcome. Notably, health anxiety at baseline was positively associated with symptom improvement while depressive symptoms was negatively related to improvement. Demographic factors were largely without significant impact on end state symptoms or improvement. We conclude that baseline symptom burden and adherence to treatment have strong predictive effects in Internet-based CBT for severe health anxiety.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Unknown 141 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 30 21%
Researcher 24 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 16%
Student > Bachelor 14 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 6%
Other 27 19%
Unknown 19 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 75 52%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 12%
Social Sciences 9 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 4 3%
Unknown 31 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2014.
All research outputs
#22,758,309
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Behaviour Research & Therapy
#2,603
of 2,672 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#186,530
of 209,461 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Behaviour Research & Therapy
#21
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,672 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,461 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.