↓ Skip to main content

Alterations in brain metabolism during the first year of HIV infection

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of NeuroVirology, April 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
66 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
Title
Alterations in brain metabolism during the first year of HIV infection
Published in
Journal of NeuroVirology, April 2011
DOI 10.1007/s13365-011-0030-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Margaret R. Lentz, Woong-Ki Kim, Hyun Kim, Caroline Soulas, Vallent Lee, Nagagopal Venna, Elkan F. Halpern, Eric S. Rosenberg, Kenneth Williams, R. G. González

Abstract

Migration of both uninfected and infected monocytes into the brain during acute HIV infection likely initiates metabolic changes that can be observed with magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS). Herein, we measured changes in brain metabolism during the first year of HIV infection and examined the relationship of these metabolite levels to CD16+ monocyte populations measured in the blood. MRS was performed on nine HIV+ subjects identified during acute HIV infection and nine seronegative control subjects. HIV+ subjects were examined within 90 days of an indeterminate Western blot, then again 2 and 6 months later, during early infection. Blood samples were collected for plasma viral RNA and monocyte subset quantification. HIV+ subjects were identified with acute viral ailment and did not display severe cognitive deficits such as dementia or minor cognitive motor disorder. Changes in lipid membrane metabolism (choline levels) in the frontal cortex and white matter were observed during the initial year of HIV infection. Greater numbers of CD16+ monocytes were associated with lower N-acetylaspartate levels and higher choline levels in the brain. These results suggest that HIV infection induces metabolic changes in the brain early during infection and that these changes may be related to monocyte dynamics in the periphery.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Argentina 1 2%
Unknown 51 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 17%
Researcher 9 17%
Student > Bachelor 8 15%
Student > Master 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Other 10 19%
Unknown 8 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 34%
Neuroscience 6 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 9%
Computer Science 2 4%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 8 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2013.
All research outputs
#14,632,302
of 22,719,618 outputs
Outputs from Journal of NeuroVirology
#483
of 925 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,672
of 108,368 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of NeuroVirology
#6
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,719,618 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 925 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,368 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.