You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Attention over time
Attention Score history
Activity
X Demographics
Mendeley demographics
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Salvage autologous transplant in relapsed multiple myeloma: long-term follow-up of the phase 3 GMMG ReLApsE trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Blood, January 2025
|
| DOI | 10.1182/blood.2024027342 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marc-Andrea Baertsch, Jana Schlenzka, Thomas Hielscher, Marc S. Raab, Sandra Sauer, Maximilian Merz, Elias Karl, Carsten Müller-Tidow, Steffen Luntz, Anna Jauch, Peter Brossart, Martin Goerner, Stefan Klein, Bertram Glass, Peter Reimer, Ullrich Graeven, Roland Fenk, Mathias Haenel, Ivana von Metzler, Hans W. Lindemann, Christof Scheid, Igor-Wolfgang Blau, Hans J. Salwender, Richard Noppeney, Britta Besemer, Katja C. Weisel, Hartmut Goldschmidt, German-Speaking Myeloma Multicenter Group, Hartmut Goldschmidt, Britta Besemer, Katja C. Weisel, Richard Noppeney, Hans J. Salwender, Igor-Wolfgang Blau, Axel Nogai, Christof Scheid, Hans W. Lindemann, Ivana von Metzler, Hans Martin, Mathias Haenel, Roland Fenk, Ullrich Graeven, Peter Reimer, Bertram Glass, Martin Schmidt-Hieber, Stefan Klein, Martin Goerner, Peter Brossart, Ingo Schmidt-Wolf |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 25% |
| Germany | 4 | 10% |
| Mexico | 2 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 5% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Uganda | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 17 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 21 | 53% |
| Scientists | 12 | 30% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 18% |
Mendeley demographics
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 20 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 5% |
| Professor | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 15% |
| Unknown | 11 | 55% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 30% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 5% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 11 | 55% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2025.
All research outputs
#1,437,539
of 34,194,383 outputs
Outputs from Blood
#1,312
of 46,692 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,369
of 403,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Blood
#24
of 212 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,194,383 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 46,692 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 403,923 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 212 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.