| Title |
Expanding Metabolic Networks: Scopes of Compounds, Robustness, and Evolution
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Molecular Evolution, September 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00239-005-0027-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Thomas Handorf, Oliver Ebenhöh, Reinhart Heinrich |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 161 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 4% |
| Germany | 2 | 1% |
| Portugal | 2 | 1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 3% |
| Unknown | 139 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 48 | 30% |
| Researcher | 35 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 13 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 22 | 14% |
| Unknown | 17 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 75 | 47% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 18 | 11% |
| Computer Science | 17 | 11% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 7 | 4% |
| Engineering | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 7% |
| Unknown | 27 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2022.
All research outputs
#3,259,637
of 22,711,242 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Molecular Evolution
#140
of 1,435 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,181
of 58,696 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Molecular Evolution
#1
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,711,242 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,435 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 58,696 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.