↓ Skip to main content

Left Ventricular Hypertrophy in Hypertensive Children and Adolescents: Predictors and Prevalence

Overview of attention for article published in Current Hypertension Reports, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
Title
Left Ventricular Hypertrophy in Hypertensive Children and Adolescents: Predictors and Prevalence
Published in
Current Hypertension Reports, July 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11906-013-0370-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rae-Ellen W. Kavey

Abstract

Left ventricular hypertrophy is an independent predictor of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in adults. In children, the primary correlate of left ventricular mass (LVM) is lean body mass, but fat mass, gender and systolic blood pressure are also contributors. LVM can be estimated from echocardiographic measurements, and by indexing this allometrically to height to the 2.7 power, the left ventricular mass index (LVMI) can be calculated. LVMI optimizes detection of left ventricular hypertrophy with established normal curves for children from birth to 18 years. In children with sustained hypertension, 8-41 % have LVMI above the 95th percentile and in 10-15.5 % of these, LVMI is elevated above levels associated with increased mortality in adults. The presence of obesity is associated with higher LVMI than is found in children with hypertension alone. In children with chronic kidney disease, left ventricular hypertrophy develops relatively early and becomes more prevalent as kidney function decreases. In summary, left ventricular hypertrophy is a sensitive marker of target organ damage in children with BP elevation, obesity and chronic kidney disease providing important management information.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Korea, Republic of 1 2%
Kenya 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Serbia 1 2%
Unknown 55 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 13%
Researcher 8 13%
Student > Master 6 10%
Student > Postgraduate 5 8%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Other 14 23%
Unknown 15 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 38%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 7%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 19 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2013.
All research outputs
#18,345,822
of 22,719,618 outputs
Outputs from Current Hypertension Reports
#548
of 732 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#148,524
of 198,143 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Hypertension Reports
#10
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,719,618 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 732 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,143 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.