↓ Skip to main content

Estimating the Efficiency of Phosphopeptide Identification by Tandem Mass Spectrometry

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
Title
Estimating the Efficiency of Phosphopeptide Identification by Tandem Mass Spectrometry
Published in
Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, March 2017
DOI 10.1007/s13361-017-1603-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chuan-Chih Hsu, Liang Xue, Justine V. Arrington, Pengcheng Wang, Juan Sebastian Paez Paez, Yuan Zhou, Jian-Kang Zhu, W. Andy Tao

Abstract

Mass spectrometry has played a significant role in the identification of unknown phosphoproteins and sites of phosphorylation in biological samples. Analyses of protein phosphorylation, particularly large scale phosphoproteomic experiments, have recently been enhanced by efficient enrichment, fast and accurate instrumentation, and better software, but challenges remain because of the low stoichiometry of phosphorylation and poor phosphopeptide ionization efficiency and fragmentation due to neutral loss. Phosphoproteomics has become an important dimension in systems biology studies, and it is essential to have efficient analytical tools to cover a broad range of signaling events. To evaluate current mass spectrometric performance, we present here a novel method to estimate the efficiency of phosphopeptide identification by tandem mass spectrometry. Phosphopeptides were directly isolated from whole plant cell extracts, dephosphorylated, and then incubated with one of three purified kinases-casein kinase II, mitogen-activated protein kinase 6, and SNF-related protein kinase 2.6-along with (16)O4- and (18)O4-ATP separately for in vitro kinase reactions. Phosphopeptides were enriched and analyzed by LC-MS. The phosphopeptide identification rate was estimated by comparing phosphopeptides identified by tandem mass spectrometry with phosphopeptide pairs generated by stable isotope labeled kinase reactions. Overall, we found that current high speed and high accuracy mass spectrometers can only identify 20%-40% of total phosphopeptides primarily due to relatively poor fragmentation, additional modifications, and low abundance, highlighting the urgent need for continuous efforts to improve phosphopeptide identification efficiency. Graphical Abstract ᅟ.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 40 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 23%
Researcher 8 20%
Student > Bachelor 6 15%
Student > Master 5 13%
Student > Postgraduate 2 5%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 6 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 18%
Chemistry 6 15%
Unspecified 2 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 5%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 8 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2017.
All research outputs
#20,660,571
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry
#3,086
of 3,835 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#248,431
of 321,180 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry
#45
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,835 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,180 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.